Represented Intel in an action in the District of Delaware against Future Link Systems involving several patents relating to various computer design, interconnect, and testing technologies. After successfully petitioning for inter partes review of certain asserted patents and defeating dispositive motions from Future Link with respect to other asserted patents, the case settled favorably for Intel before trial.
Currently defending JP Morgan Chase & Co. and Citibank in patent infringement actions filed by Intellectual Ventures II LLC alleging infringement of patents related to computer and network security technologies.
Represented Samsung as Complainant in an ITC action against Nvidia. Samsung asserted three patents at the August 2015 hearing, which resulted in a victory for the client as the ALJ found that Nvidia violated all three patents and recommended issuance of a limited exclusion order (LEO) against certain Nvidia products. The Commission granted only partial review as to one patent, essentially affirming the LEO against Nvidia. The case thereafter settled favorably for Samsung.
Represented inventor Luciano Paone in a patent infringement action against Microsoft in the Eastern District of New York relating to data encryption technologies. After successfully defeating Microsoft’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, as well as its Daubert motion to exclude Plaintiff’s damages expert, the case settled favorably for Mr. Paone.
Defended H. Lundbeck A/S and Forest Laboratories Inc. in a patent infringement litigation brought against LEXAPRO® and CELEXA® antidepressants in the Southern District of New York. Defendants obtained dismissal with prejudice of one patent and summary judgment of invalidity on one of two asserted claims in the remaining patent. Following a three-week jury trial, the court granted judgment as a matter of law that the second claim was invalid, resulting in complete victory for clients. On appeal, the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the trial court’s judgment as a matter of law.
Defended Samsung in a patent infringement action in the Eastern District of Texas involving patents relating to flash memory technologies. After motion practice attacking the plaintiff's infringement allegations and Rule 11 basis for asserting patents against Samsung, the plaintiff dropped with prejudice those patents and its remaining infringement allegations against nearly 70 products. Immediately thereafter, the case settled favorably for Samsung.
