Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
- Represented Motorola in a lawsuit alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and copyright infringement against Hytera. Part of the trial team that secured a complete victory, including compensatory and exemplary damages amounting to $764 million, which represented the entire amount requested.
Syntel v. Cognizant and TriZetto
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
- Representing Cognizant and TriZetto in trade secret, unfair competition and breach of contract matter. Part of the trial team that secured a complete victory following a week-long jury trial in favor of TriZetto, which included an award of $855 million in damages.
LivePerson v. [24]7.ai
United States District Court, Northern District of California
- Representing a company that provides platform for online customer service in action for patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation, among other torts.
Garcia v. City of Los Angeles
United States District Court, Central District of California
- Representing several unhoused individuals and a community organization in a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, alleging that its ordinances regarding the removal and destruction of unhoused persons' property violate both the U.S. Constitution and the California Constitution. The Court already granted a preliminary injunction, enjoining the City of Los Angeles from enforcing two ordinances challenged in the lawsuit.
In re Certain Graphic Systems
United States International Trade Commission
- Led team representing Respondent MediaTek before the ITC.
Sneed v. McDonald
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Argued and briefed appeal challenging equitable tolling legal standard relied upon by U.S. Court of Veterans Claims, awaiting Court’s decision.
Intel Corp. v. Future Link Systems, LLC
United States District Court of District of Delaware
- Represented Intel in a nine-patent declaratory judgment suit involving multiple computer technologies in the District of Delaware.
Medtronic v. NuVasive
United States District Court, Southern District of California
- Represented Medtronic in multi-patent infringement litigation involving spinal fusion technology.
Sneed v. Shinseki
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Successfully briefed appeal challenging equitable tolling legal standard relied upon by U.S. Court of Veterans Claims; obtained vacatur of judgment below and remand for reconsideration under the correct legal standard.
In re Lutz Biedermann and Jurgen Harms
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Successfully briefed appeal of a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirming the rejection of claims in a patent application relating to a bone screw. A three-judge appellate panel rejected the government's argument and remanded the matter for further proceedings.
DePuy Orthopedics Inc. vs. Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
- Represented Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital (LAOH) in connection with a multi-million dollar patent licensing and infringement dispute.
- Successfully represented LAOH before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board refused to institute inter partes review proceedings against LAOH’s patents.
ViaSat, Inc., et al. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Represented Boeing in a patent infringement case seeking disclosure of Boeing’s trade secrets and propriety information relating to satellite technology.
Finjan, Inc. v. McAfee, Inc.
United States District Court of Delaware
- Represented McAfee, Inc. in patent litigation brought by Finjan, Inc. against McAfee, Symantec, Sophos and Websense.
