BASF v. SNF, 955 F.3d 958 (Fed. Cir. 2020): Successfully represented BASF as plaintiff in a patent infringement appeal involving superabsorbent polymer technologies. The Federal Circuit reversed in part and vacated in part the district court’s summary judgment of invalidity.
Oyster v. Cisco, 816 F. App’x 438 (Fed. Cir. 2020): Successfully represented Cisco as defendant in an appeal from a patent-infringement suit involving networking technologies. The Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment in Cisco’s favor.
Janssen Biotech v. Celltrion Healthcare, 796 F. App’x 741 (Fed. Cir. 2020): Successfully represented Celltrion as defendant in two BPCIA patent-infringement appeals. The Federal Circuit affirmed that Celltrion did not infringe any valid patents.
Arkema v. Honeywell, 939 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2019): Successfully represented Honeywell as patent owner in an appeal involving automobile refrigerant compositions. The Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s decision as arbitrary and capricious, and remanded.
Allergan v. Sandoz, 717 F. App’x 991 (Fed. Cir. 2017): Successfully represented Sandoz as defendant in an appeal from a three-patent Hatch-Waxman suit. The Federal Circuit affirmed Sandoz’s non-infringement of two patents and reversed the district court’s infringement judgment as to the third. Successfully opposed Allergan’s petition for rehearing.
Arctic Cat v. Bombardier (S.D. Fla., Fed. Cir., S. Ct.): Successfully represented plaintiff Arctic Cat in opposing Bombardier’s petition for a writ of certiorari, confirming the judgment of willful patent infringement and award of treble damages. Representing Arctic Cat in ongoing district court and appellate proceedings involving Arctic Cat’s patented personal watercraft technology.
SandBox v. PropX (Fed. Cir.): Representing SandBox as patent owner in several PTAB appeals involving hydraulic fracturing technologies.
Amgen v. Sanofi (Fed. Cir.): Representing Regeneron/Sanofi as defendants in an appeal from a patent infringement trial involving monocolonal antibody treatments.
iRobot v. SharkNinja (D. Mass.): Representing iRobot as plaintiff in a five- patent infringement suit involving robotic vacuum cleaner technologies.
