Article

Print Friendly Page
11/28/2012
Source: New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law
Authors: Joshua L. Simmons
 

Inventions Made for Hire

Joshua Simmons authored an article for the N.Y.U. Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law. The article is a comparison of the developments in copyright law and patent law in the nineteenth century that resulted in copyright law developing a work made for hire doctrine while patent law only developed a patch work of judge-made employment doctrines. The article theorizes that patent law did not develop an inventions made for hire doctrine, because inventive activity was almost exclusively perceived to be performed by individuals. It goes on to suggest that, as patentable inventions today are generally perceived to be invented collaboratively, the Patent Act should be amended to borrow from the Copyright Act and adopt a principle similar to the work made for hire doctrine.

An eBook version of the article is available at the journal's website: http://jipel.law.nyu.edu/2012/11/inventions-made-for-hire/.

© 2017 Kirkland & Ellis LLP