Securities Litigation
Related ProfessionalsOverview
Kirkland is a commercial and practical litigation powerhouse. They are adept in all sorts of litigation. - Chambers USA, 2025
Kirkland’s Securities Litigation Practice Group is led by a core group of experienced trial lawyers renowned for winning complex, bet-the-company securities cases, many precedent-setting, and often involving cutting-edge issues.
Our team handles the full spectrum of securities matters, including 10(b) stock drop and IPO-related class actions, shareholder derivative suits at the forefront of Delaware law, M&A and proxy-related disputes, books and records demands and other corporate governance-related disputes, and litigation demands on boards. Our litigators also routinely represent clients in securities litigations that relate to investigations and enforcement actions.
Our litigators are known for developing innovative strategies to win complex cases, and we customize strategies and tactics to each client and situation. We have deep experience handling litigation spanning multiple jurisdictions involving concurrent securities fraud suits, derivative actions and document demands, as well as regulatory and legislative inquiries and the media. Kirkland’s clients benefit from coming to us as a one-stop shop.” We collaborate closely across practice groups and offices and provide services across various disciplines. We routinely represent clients in complex securities litigations that relate to government investigations and enforcement actions, working closely with the preeminent lawyers in Kirkland’s government, regulatory and internal investigations and securities and futures enforcement practices to develop and provide a coordinated response.
Our approach and commitment to early trial preparation and trial readiness often produces more favorable pre-trial results. We know how to get cases dismissed, and we know how to litigate cases if they survive dismissal, how to handle discovery efficiently and effectively, how to defeat class certification, how to win at summary judgment, and if necessary, how to win at trial.
Recent Experience
Acadia Healthcare Company
Kachrodia v. Acadia; Dyar v. Acadia (M.D. Tenn.)
Representing Acadia Healthcare Company in putative class action litigation alleging violation of federal securities laws concerning Acadia’s admissions, length of stay and billing practices at certain inpatient psychiatric facilities.
Honeywell International, Inc.
Kanefsky et al. v. Honeywell Int’l Inc. et al. (D.N.J.); Wayne County Employees’ Ret. Sys. v. Honeywell Int’l, et al. (D.N.J.); In re Honeywell Int’l Consolidated Stockholder Litigation (D. Del.)
Represented Honeywell International Inc. in consolidated shareholder derivative litigation alleging breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets and violation of federal securities laws in connection with Honeywell’s historic method of accounting for asbestos-related liabilities. Kirkland won full dismissal of the derivative suit and resolved the securities litigation for pennies on the dollar.
Represented a Honeywell employee and former officer of Garrett Motion, Inc., in a putative securities class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of Honeywell's spin-off of Garrett and its accounting for asbestos-related liabilities. Kirkland won full dismissal after oral argument.
Oaktree Capital Management
Plymouth County Retirement Assoc., et al. v. Array Technologies, Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
Obtained the complete dismissal of a consolidated putative class action against Oaktree Capital Management and certain of its affiliates and professionals alleging violations of federal securities laws and breach of fiduciary duty arising out of Array Technologies Inc.’s initial public offering and its secondary public offerings.
Rupert Murdoch & Fox Corporation
Brokerage Jamie Goldenberg Komen Rev. Trust v. Breyer, et al. (Del. Ch.)
Won complete dismissal in 2020 for certain former officers and directors of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (21CF) (including Co-Executive Chairmen Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan K. Murdoch, CEO James R. Murdoch) and Fox Corporation, of a shareholder action arising out of 21CF’s $73.1 billion merger with The Walt Disney Company. The plaintiff, a stockholder of 21CF, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment related to certain compensation awards made by 21CF’s compensation committee to the Murdochs.
Target Corporation
Perez v. Target (D. Minn.); Gervat v. Cornell, et al. (Minn. Dist. Ct.); Craig, et al. v. Target, et al. (M.D. Fla.)
Representing Target and numerous of its current and former directors as lead counsel in securities litigation and shareholder derivative litigation relating to inventory statements as well as securities litigation arising out of Target's Pride collection. Kirkland secured dismissal of securities action related to inventory statements.
The Boeing Company
In re The Boeing Company Aircraft Securities Litigation (N.D. Ill.)
Representing Boeing in a consolidated putative securities class action alleging Boeing issued false and misleading statements to shareholders regarding the 737 Max Aircraft. Kirkland won dismissal of certain claims alleging that Boeing made misleading statements responding to a 737 Max crash and claims brought against a former Boeing director.
Chopp v. Bradway, et al. (D. Del.); Seafarers Pension Plan v. Bradway, et al. (N.D. Ill.; 7th Cir.)
Obtained back-to-back wins in a one-week span for Boeing, securing dismissal of two separate derivative actions concerning its 737 Max Aircraft; one of these decisions was the first to apply a forum-selection bylaw that requires derivative actions to be filed in Delaware Chancery Court to a federal claim subject to exclusive federal jurisdiction.
3G Capital
3G Securities Litigation (N.D. Ill.; Del. Ch.; Del.)
Defended 3G Capital, formerly one of Kraft Heinz’s largest shareholders, in putative securities class action and related derivative litigation filed in Illinois federal court and the Delaware Court of Chancery related to a writedown of Kraft’s assets and the disclosure of an SEC investigation. Kirkland won complete dismissal of the Delaware derivative actions and the Illinois derivative case. First Delaware dismissal affirmed on appeal. Settlement achieved in class action.
Tier 1 Securities Litigation
The Legal 500 U.S., 2025
Tier 1 Securities Litigation: Nationwide
U.S. News and World Report – Best Law Firms, 2025
Tier 1 Securities Litigation
Benchmark Litigation, 2025